![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I have been contacted on MySpace, with a follow-up in my personal email, by a headhunter who works for Walt Disney Feature Casting.
From: Planet
Date: May 23, 2006 12:32 PM
My name is Janet and I work for Walt Disney Feature Casting. We are currently casting a film for Miramax & we are still looking for this role of 'Roberta'. This is a difficult role to find, as it is very specific. We are moving very fast.
The film shoots in Boston. We are located in LA. Where are you located? Would you be interested in auditioning for it?
Please get back to me as soon as possible. You can e-mail me at Janet.xxxx@Disney.com. (email edited for privacy)
Thank you,
Janet
PEOPLE!! SHE'S NOT SHITTING ME!!! SHE SENT ME SIDE LINES AND A SCRIPT AND INFORMATION FROM A CASTING CALL!!!!
Now, Cons:
1 - an audition tape does not guarantee a part.
2 - The part calls for a huge woman, 'shoulders like a bank vault'; '6 feet tall, 330+ pounds'; 'intimidating' body type and personality; 'small goatee' 'unattractive' all of which freaks me out
3 - I hate myself on video
4 - I don't know how to do a Boston accent, and while I've been known to speak without an accent before, I'm not certain I can drop it on command
5 - I'm scared shitless
6 - Ben Affleck doesn't direct hit movies
7 - I don't know if I could get off work for filming if I were accepted for the part
Pros:
1 - an audition tape will be seen by people who might think I'm appropriate for a role in some OTHER film
2 - OMG! AN AUDITION TAPE!
3 - Just because I'd be ugly in the film doesn't mean I'd have to be ugly at the premiere
4 - Affleck is married to Jen Garner, who GREW UP IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD!
5 - I'm flattered half out of my mind until I realize she was looking for somebody ugly for the part
6 - They would fly me to Boston for filming if I got the part
no subject
Date: 2006-05-24 02:04 am (UTC)I didn't know that you were an actress, though. What roles have you played in the past? Was it theatre? Have you ever done TV or movies before? Am I being too nosy?
no subject
Date: 2006-05-24 04:24 am (UTC)I'm not really an actress. I was in the female version of "The Odd Couple" in local theater before Scarlett was born. That's the limit of my experience, and there's nothing on my MySpace to indicate that I act. She was just going by photos, I think. I look tall in one of them.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-24 02:04 am (UTC)I think between me, my husband, and assorted friends, we could coach you in Boston accent. I haven't discussed this with them, yet, just want to run it by you first.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-24 04:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-24 02:32 am (UTC)Good for you. That would rock if you got the part.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-24 04:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-24 04:01 am (UTC)If you can (work; Scarlett) go for this, do so. I have friends in the biz and when they want a type and they think you might be it, jump down there throats.
This is teriffic; I am so happy for you, hon, truly. Thank you so much for sharing the excitement.
And yes, you'd only be ugly in the film, Emma Thomson is not Nanny McPhee.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-24 04:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-24 04:37 am (UTC)'Rambo'* is only five seven (I could spank him); people still go see his flicks. And John Rhys-Davies is a lot taller than "Gimli". If you are genuinely the person they want 'inside', they'll use you.
(* an extra in the know also said that you 'aren't allowed to look him in the eye'...)
no subject
Date: 2006-05-24 12:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-24 05:33 am (UTC)Boston!! 8^)
no subject
Date: 2006-05-24 10:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-24 01:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-24 12:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-24 08:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-24 12:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-24 02:14 pm (UTC)Renfaire has me running nuts. I'll get back soon...I promise!!
no subject
Date: 2006-05-24 02:40 pm (UTC)then if you're asked to do publicity, you can be all gorgeoused-out and impress folks that much more!
no subject
Date: 2006-05-24 02:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 02:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 12:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 11:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 11:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 07:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 11:12 am (UTC)